Re: RE: db block size
- From: "Jonathan Lewis" <jonathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 08:57:49 +0100
Note in-line
Regards
Jonathan Lewis
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/faq/ind_faq.html
The Co-operative Oracle Users' FAQ
http://www.jlcomp.demon.co.uk/seminar.html
Optimising Oracle Seminar - schedule updated May 1st
----- Original Message -----
From: <solbeach@xxxxxxx>
To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, June 21, 2004 8:32 PM
Subject: Re: RE: db block size
WRT the question of whether smaller block sizes will allow
Oracle to perform better, I don't see where it can have any
impact (one way or the other). From my perspective it is
kind of like asking which pizza will fill you up more;
a 12 inch pizza cut into 4 slices or a 12 inch pizza cut
into 8 slices. A 12" pizza is the same size; regardless of
how you slice it.
Not true - depending on the filling, it may be a lot
easier to pick up the smaller slices with one hand;
which affects the options for eating pizza and drinking
{insert liquid of preference here} at the same time.
Comparing disk i/os - you may have to make 8 trips
to the pizza box with the smaller slice - but you may
have to move, and co-ordinatate both hands when
you reduce the number of trips to 4.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
- References:
- Re: RE: db block size
- From: solbeach
Other related posts:
- » Re: RE: db block size
- » Re: RE: db block size
- » Re: RE: db block size
- Re: RE: db block size
- From: solbeach