RE: RE: anyone ever use sub-partitioning?

You are saying the avg row size is one byte? (sorry seems weird)

You don't need to partition a table to use PDML!

Waleed

-----Original Message-----
From: ryan.gaffuri@xxxxxxx [mailto:ryan.gaffuri@xxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2004 11:12 AM
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: RE: anyone ever use sub-partitioning?


yes and 95% of the data we don't need. Not allowed to get rid of it, =
because its too close to our release date, wasn't allowed to work on the =
ETL process until the last minute, so I'm in a bind. :(. We could shrink =
many of these tables down by about 90% if we dumped the unneeded data. =
There are 208 columns in one and we need like 8 of them.=20

not that I'm complaining or anything.=20
>=20
> From: "Khedr, Waleed" <Waleed.Khedr@xxxxxxx>
> Date: 2004/04/30 Fri AM 10:31:49 EDT
> To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: anyone ever use sub-partitioning?
>=20
> So you have average row size =3D3D 1 ?
>=20


----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to:  oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to:  oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Other related posts: