Re: RE: anyone ever use sub-partitioning?

yes and 95% of the data we don't need. Not allowed to get rid of it, because 
its too close to our release date, wasn't allowed to work on the ETL process 
until the last minute, so I'm in a bind. :(. We could shrink many of these 
tables down by about 90% if we dumped the unneeded data. There are 208 columns 
in one and we need like 8 of them. 

not that I'm complaining or anything. 
> 
> From: "Khedr, Waleed" <Waleed.Khedr@xxxxxxx>
> Date: 2004/04/30 Fri AM 10:31:49 EDT
> To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: RE: anyone ever use sub-partitioning?
> 
> So you have average row size =3D 1 ?
> 


----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to:  oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Other related posts: