Re: RAID Reliability Calculations (Was Storage array advice anyone?)

  • From: Steven Patenaude <spatenau@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2005 11:50:29 -0600

Oops, I forgot to "reply all".

Yes, I should have said "independent studies".  Vendors probably
wouldn't want to share this, and I image clients don't want to
advertise any unreliability...

Thanks,
Steven

On Thu,  6 Jan 2005 17:11:26 +0000, chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Steven,
> 
> None that I'm aware of but I'm sure the vendors will have some stats, 
> although I
> expect that they don't share that info willingly.
> 
> Chris
> 
> Quoting Steven Patenaude <spatenau@xxxxxxxxx>:
> 
> > Thanks for the information.  A very interesting read.
> >
> > Are there any studies of RAID failures in the field?  That is to say,
> > correlated disk failures can dramatically increase the chance of data
> > loss over the theoretical.  Have there been any studies to compare
> > real rates of data loss to the theoretical rate of data loss?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Steven
> >
> 
> 
> Chris Dunscombe
> 
> Christallize Ltd
>
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Other related posts: