Re: RAC questions
- From: johan Eriksson <johan.eriksson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Joseph Amalraj <joseph@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 16:02:52 +0100
On Fri, 2006-01-20 at 06:09 -0800, Joseph Amalraj wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The cluster interconnect should not be configured with Virtual IP.
>
it wasn't. Public IP and VIP on eth0, interconnect on eth1 and it was
eth1 that was taken offline.
> Load balancing is at the connection level. So if the users disconnect
> and reconnect, they will connect to the correct node.
No way to make it spread the load evenly on all nodes? 100% on one node
and 0% on the second doesn't strike me as optimal...
>
> Have found Mike Ault and Madhu Tumma's book on RAC quite informative.
> Metalink also has some useful articles.
I will check out this book then.
/johan
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- References:
- Re: RAC questions
- From: Joseph Amalraj
Other related posts:
- » RAC questions
- » Re: RAC questions
- » Re: RAC questions
- » RE: RAC questions
- » RE: RAC questions
- Re: RAC questions
- From: Joseph Amalraj