Re: RAC on nfs
- From: "Alex zeng" <junk4trash@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: kevinc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 6 May 2006 11:12:39 +0800
Never mind.
On 4/14/06, oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Ugh, apologies for being on a short fuse on this thread. Please
excuse my flame on this. It skipped my mind that the thread was
about using simple NFS for training/testing purposes and not about
the viability of Oracle on NAS.
Alex, please accept my apology because I see you weren't just
dismissing Oracle on NAS as I presumed.
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Kevin Closson
>>>Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 10:08 AM
>>>To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>Subject: RE: RAC on nfs
>>>
>>> Subject: Re: RAC on nfs
>>>
>>>
>>> I have tried it on Redhat Linux with two instances.
>
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
This is Alex zeng, Skype me: hans9zeng
--The mount is there.
Other related posts:
- » RAC on nfs
- » Re: RAC on nfs
- » Re: RAC on nfs
- » Re: RAC on nfs
- » RE: RAC on nfs
- » RE: RAC on nfs
- » Re: RAC on nfs
Ugh, apologies for being on a short fuse on this thread. Please excuse my flame on this. It skipped my mind that the thread was about using simple NFS for training/testing purposes and not about the viability of Oracle on NAS.
Alex, please accept my apology because I see you weren't just dismissing Oracle on NAS as I presumed.
>>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Kevin Closson >>>Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 10:08 AM >>>To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>Subject: RE: RAC on nfs >>> >>> Subject: Re: RAC on nfs >>> >>> >>> I have tried it on Redhat Linux with two instances. > -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l