Re: RAC interconnect packet size??
- From: Rajeev Prabhakar <rprabha01@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: TESTAJ3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 08:37:25 -0400
Joe, Based on some of the implementation experiences I have had in the past, I recall that we couldn't implement it (jumbo frames) as not all of our network cards and switches would support a bumped up setting for our clustered environment. So, we had to settle down at 1500. -Rajeev On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 8:13 AM, <TESTAJ3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- References:
- RAC interconnect packet size??
- From: TESTAJ3
- RAC interconnect packet size??
Other related posts:
- » RAC interconnect packet size?? - TESTAJ3
- » Re: RAC interconnect packet size?? - Rajeev Prabhakar
- » Re: RAC interconnect packet size?? - Frits Hoogland
- » RE: RAC interconnect packet size?? - Bobak, Mark
- » Re: RAC interconnect packet size?? - Yechiel Adar
- » Re: RAC interconnect packet size?? - Greg Rahn
- » RE: RAC interconnect packet size?? - Bobak, Mark
- » RE: RAC interconnect packet size?? - Bobak, Mark
- » RE: RAC interconnect packet size?? - Tanel Poder
- » RE: RAC interconnect packet size?? - Bobak, Mark
- » Re: RAC interconnect packet size?? - Riyaj Shamsudeen
- » Re: RAC interconnect packet size?? - Riyaj Shamsudeen
- » Re: RAC interconnect packet size?? - John Kanagaraj