Re: RAC in NAS
- From: Mogens Nørrgaard <mln@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: shrekdba@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2006 22:51:14 +0200
That's the Oracle equivalent of Guantanamo. That's too harsh, man. Can't
do it... Wouldn't want it done to myself, in fact :-).
Mogens
bill thater wrote:
On 8/2/06, Mogens Nørrgaard <mln@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
ANY suggestion for doing that, including possible disciplinary actions,
are most welcome.
deny them strong drink until they submit acceptiable work.;-) on the
other hand, strong drink may be *required* for acceptable work.
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: RAC in NAS
- From: bill thater
- References:
- Re: RAC in NAS
- From: Mogens Nørrgaard
- Re: RAC in NAS
- From: Mark Brinsmead
- Re: RAC in NAS
- From: Jared Still
- Re: RAC in NAS
- From: Mark Brinsmead
- Re: RAC in NAS
- From: Mogens Nørrgaard
- Re: RAC in NAS
- From: Gints Plivna
- Re: RAC in NAS
- From: Mogens Nørrgaard
- Re: RAC in NAS
- From: bill thater
Other related posts:
- » RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » RE: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » RE: RAC in NAS
- » RE: RAC in NAS
- » RE: RAC in NAS
- » RE: RAC in NAS
- » RE: RAC in NAS
- » RE: RAC in NAS
- » RE: RAC in NAS
- » RE: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » RE: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » RE: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » RE: RAC in NAS
- » RE: RAC in NAS
- » RE: RAC in NAS
- » RE: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » RE: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » RE: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » RE: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
On 8/2/06, Mogens Nørrgaard <mln@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
ANY suggestion for doing that, including possible disciplinary actions, are most welcome.
deny them strong drink until they submit acceptiable work.;-) on the other hand, strong drink may be *required* for acceptable work.
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- Re: RAC in NAS
- From: bill thater
- Re: RAC in NAS
- From: Mogens Nørrgaard
- Re: RAC in NAS
- From: Mark Brinsmead
- Re: RAC in NAS
- From: Jared Still
- Re: RAC in NAS
- From: Mark Brinsmead
- Re: RAC in NAS
- From: Mogens Nørrgaard
- Re: RAC in NAS
- From: Gints Plivna
- Re: RAC in NAS
- From: Mogens Nørrgaard
- Re: RAC in NAS
- From: bill thater