Re: RAC in NAS
- From: "Frits Hoogland" <frits.hoogland@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: kevinc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 18:40:11 +0200
exactly my point!
I've seen oracle doing async IO with the 2.4 kernel doing other system calls
(the kludgy stuff you mentioned), and oracle doing async IO with the
2.6kernel (io_submit system call).
Ever looked at orion in conjunction with linux? It doesn't seem to do async
IO.
frits
On 7/29/06, Kevin Closson <kevinc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> on the other hand, if the system call is the same, what
kind of magic is involved which makes oracle do asynchronous IO? The
system call must tell the operating system what kind of IO it wants to
do, either by doing a call which implies the kind of synchronousity, or
by setting a flag which alters the synchronousity.
...but the calls are not the same. If you strace 10g DBWR, after linking
in
libaio and setting filesystemio_options=direcIO, you will see
io_submit(2)
calls which are new to 2.6 kernel. There really was no "real" async IO
prior to the 2.6 kerenl. There was some kludgy stuff piggy-packed on
the socket interface of all things, but it was crazy.
Then , of course, if $ORACLE_HOME/lib/libodm* is a real ODM library you
get
async IO regardless of what libaio is and regardless of what init.ora
parameters you set...when ODM is linked in, all the "async*" init.ora
params
are no-ops and filesystemio_options doesn't do anything either. You just
get
async IO
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: RAC in NAS
- From: Kevin Closson
- Re: RAC in NAS
- From: Nuno Souto
- References:
- Re: RAC in NAS
- From: Frits Hoogland
- RE: RAC in NAS
- From: Kevin Closson
Other related posts:
- » RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » RE: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » RE: RAC in NAS
- » RE: RAC in NAS
- » RE: RAC in NAS
- » RE: RAC in NAS
- » RE: RAC in NAS
- » RE: RAC in NAS
- » RE: RAC in NAS
- » RE: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » RE: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » RE: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » RE: RAC in NAS
- » RE: RAC in NAS
- » RE: RAC in NAS
- » RE: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » RE: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » RE: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » RE: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
- » Re: RAC in NAS
>> on the other hand, if the system call is the same, what kind of magic is involved which makes oracle do asynchronous IO? The system call must tell the operating system what kind of IO it wants to do, either by doing a call which implies the kind of synchronousity, or by setting a flag which alters the synchronousity.
...but the calls are not the same. If you strace 10g DBWR, after linking in libaio and setting filesystemio_options=direcIO, you will see io_submit(2) calls which are new to 2.6 kernel. There really was no "real" async IO prior to the 2.6 kerenl. There was some kludgy stuff piggy-packed on the socket interface of all things, but it was crazy.
Then , of course, if $ORACLE_HOME/lib/libodm* is a real ODM library you get async IO regardless of what libaio is and regardless of what init.ora parameters you set...when ODM is linked in, all the "async*" init.ora params are no-ops and filesystemio_options doesn't do anything either. You just get async IO
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- RE: RAC in NAS
- From: Kevin Closson
- Re: RAC in NAS
- From: Nuno Souto
- Re: RAC in NAS
- From: Frits Hoogland
- RE: RAC in NAS
- From: Kevin Closson