Re: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- From: "K Gopalakrishnan" <kaygopal@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: richard.goulet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:00:35 -0800
Rich,
I presonally know around a handful installations of strech clusters
and been part of it. It works and it IS supported by Oracle.
-Gopal
On Jan 21, 2008 9:28 AM, Goulet, Dick <richard.goulet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Nigel,
>
> I have not found any place where I can see that Oracle supports
> Stretch clusters and given that you have to use ASM on a RAC install
> I've serious doubts about its functionality. The idea I will agree is
> not far fetched, but the time lag that can occur is undoubtly can cause
> serious damage to the cluster. I've run RAC systems before on 10baseT
> and it was absolutely unacceptable. The time delay for the interlink
> dragged the system down way too hard. But times change so let me know
> how your project goes.
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Dick Goulet / Capgemini
> North America P&C / East Business Unit
> Senior Oracle DBA / Hosting
> Office: 508.573.1978 / Mobile: 508.742.5795 / www.capgemini.com
> Fax: 508.229.2019 / Email: richard.goulet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
--
Best Regards,
K Gopalakrishnan
Co-Author: Oracle Wait Interface, Oracle Press 2004
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/007222729X/
Author: Oracle Database 10g RAC Handbook, Oracle Press 2006
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/007146509X/
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- References:
- Re: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- From: Nigel Thomas
- RE: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- From: Goulet, Dick
Other related posts:
- » RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » Re: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » Re: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » RE: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » RE: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » Re: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » RE: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » Re: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » RE: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » Re: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » RE: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » RE: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » Re: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » Re: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » Re: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » RE: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » Re: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » RE: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » Re: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » Re: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » Re: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » RE: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » RE: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » Re: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- Re: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- From: Nigel Thomas
- RE: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- From: Goulet, Dick