RE: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- From: "Goulet, Dick" <richard.goulet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2008 08:42:26 -0500
A question to the group. A couple of you have mentioned "Dark Fiber" as
the medium that you use to interconnect these stretch clusters. Now
I've heard of the stuff, but back then it was one of those technologies
that one used only when money was NOT a consideration. The project at
that time would have required linking two buildings 8 miles apart with
Dark Fiber that alone had a cost on $1M per month. Has that come down
recently to where it is something that's affordable?
______________________________________________________________
Dick Goulet / Capgemini
North America P&C / East Business Unit
Senior Oracle DBA / Hosting
Office: 508.573.1978 / Mobile: 508.742.5795 / www.capgemini.com
Fax: 508.229.2019 / Email: richard.goulet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
45 Bartlett St. / Marlborough, MA 01752
Together: the Collaborative Business Experience
______________________________________________________________
This message contains information that may be privileged or confidential and is
the property of the Capgemini Group. It is intended only for the person to whom
it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are not authorized
to read, print, retain, copy, disseminate, distribute, or use this message or
any part thereof. If you receive this message in error, please notify the
sender immediately and delete all copies of this message.
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- From: Mercadante, Thomas F (LABOR)
- References:
- Re: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- From: Nigel Thomas
- RE: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- From: Goulet, Dick
Other related posts:
- » RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » Re: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » Re: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » RE: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » RE: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » Re: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » RE: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » Re: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » RE: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » Re: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » RE: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » RE: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » Re: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » Re: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » Re: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » RE: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » Re: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » RE: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » Re: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » Re: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » Re: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » RE: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » RE: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » Re: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- RE: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- From: Mercadante, Thomas F (LABOR)
- Re: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- From: Nigel Thomas
- RE: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- From: Goulet, Dick