Re: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- From: "Pedro Espinoza" <raindoctor@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: richard.goulet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 15:34:32 -0500
Minimizing the human error is all about. LUN masking partially solves
the problem of multiple systems seeing same suns, unless they are
sharing luns across a cluster. If it is cluster, it is cluster manager
that should put some checks to avoid these kind of errors.
On Jan 22, 2008 1:15 PM, Goulet, Dick <richard.goulet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> OH DEAR, yes. Human error, mount the same san disk on two systems at
> different times (1 week apart) and see what happens. Newfs does wonderful
> things!!
>
>
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Dick Goulet / Capgemini
> North America P&C / East Business Unit
> Senior Oracle DBA / Hosting
> Office: 508.573.1978 / Mobile: 508.742.5795 / www.capgemini.com
> Fax: 508.229.2019 / Email: richard.goulet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 45 Bartlett St. / Marlborough, MA 01752
>
> Together: the Collaborative Business Experience
> ______________________________________________________________
>
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- References:
- Re: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- From: Dan Norris
- Re: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- From: Jared Still
- RE: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- From: Goulet, Dick
- Re: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- From: Jared Still
- RE: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- From: Goulet, Dick
Other related posts:
- » RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » Re: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » Re: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » RE: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » RE: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » Re: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » RE: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » Re: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » RE: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » Re: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » RE: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » RE: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » Re: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » Re: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » Re: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » RE: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » Re: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » RE: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » Re: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » Re: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » Re: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » RE: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » RE: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- » Re: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- Re: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- From: Dan Norris
- Re: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- From: Jared Still
- RE: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- From: Goulet, Dick
- Re: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- From: Jared Still
- RE: RAC Vs Standby Database between Primary and Secondary Data Centers
- From: Goulet, Dick