Re: Quick and dirty way to compare table contents
- From: Tanel Põder <tanel.poder.003@xxxxxxx>
- To: "ORACLE-L" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 14:40:21 -0700
One easy way to prove that data is NOT identical would be fully analyzing
the tables with 254 bucket histograms on all columns and then comparing the
generated statistics.
Tanel.
----- Original Message -----
From: "bill thater" <shrekdba@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <mdemenko@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <vadimbobrov@xxxxxxxxx>; <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 2:26 PM
Subject: Re: Quick and dirty way to compare table contents
On 2/22/06, Maxim <mdemenko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Don't think it will work ( possible different nls settings, statistics
come
in mind), but even simply exported the same schema twice ( into different
files) and got different checksums for both files.
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Quick and dirty way to compare table contents
- From: Tanel Põder
- Re: Quick and dirty way to compare table contents
- From: Ranko Mosic
- References:
- Re: Quick and dirty way to compare table contents
- From: Ranko Mosic
- RE: Quick and dirty way to compare table contents
- From: Vadim Bobrov
- Re: Quick and dirty way to compare table contents
- From: Maxim
- Re: Quick and dirty way to compare table contents
- From: bill thater
Other related posts:
- » Quick and dirty way to compare table contents
- » RE: Quick and dirty way to compare table contents
- » Re: Quick and dirty way to compare table contents
- » RE: Quick and dirty way to compare table contents
- » Re: Quick and dirty way to compare table contents
- » RE: Quick and dirty way to compare table contents
- » Re: Quick and dirty way to compare table contents
- » RE: Quick and dirty way to compare table contents
- » Re: Quick and dirty way to compare table contents
- » RE: Quick and dirty way to compare table contents
- » RE: Quick and dirty way to compare table contents
- » Re: Quick and dirty way to compare table contents
- » Re: Quick and dirty way to compare table contents
- » Re: Quick and dirty way to compare table contents
- » Re: Quick and dirty way to compare table contents
- » Re: Quick and dirty way to compare table contents
- » RE: Quick and dirty way to compare table contents
- » Re: Quick and dirty way to compare table contents
- » Re: Quick and dirty way to compare table contents
- » Re: Quick and dirty way to compare table contents
- » RE: Quick and dirty way to compare table contents
- » Re: Quick and dirty way to compare table contents
- » Re: Quick and dirty way to compare table contents
- » Re: Quick and dirty way to compare table contents
- » Re: Quick and dirty way to compare table contents
- » RE: Quick and dirty way to compare table contents
- » Re: Quick and dirty way to compare table contents
- » RE: Quick and dirty way to compare table contents
- » Re: Quick and dirty way to compare table contents
Don't think it will work ( possible different nls settings, statistics come
in mind), but even simply exported the same schema twice ( into different
files) and got different checksums for both files.
-- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- Re: Quick and dirty way to compare table contents
- From: Tanel Põder
- Re: Quick and dirty way to compare table contents
- From: Ranko Mosic
- Re: Quick and dirty way to compare table contents
- From: Ranko Mosic
- RE: Quick and dirty way to compare table contents
- From: Vadim Bobrov
- Re: Quick and dirty way to compare table contents
- From: Maxim
- Re: Quick and dirty way to compare table contents
- From: bill thater