Re: Query capture
- From: Wolfgang Breitling <breitliw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: stephen booth <stephenbooth.uk@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2005 14:33:43 -0600
Stephen,
The "you" wasn't meant personal. I know that you just wrote a quick sql
in response to the question on Oracle-L. I just wanted to point out an
all-to-easy made mistake.
stephen booth wrote:
> On Apr 7, 2005 8:06 PM, Wolfgang Breitling <breitliw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>>The old problem. You are relying on a specific order of execution of the
>>predicates. Oracle is perfectly in its right to calculate
>>(a.elapsed_time/(1000000*a.executions)) > 5
>>before
>>a.executions > 0
>
>
> Actually it was just a case that it worked when I tried it and so it
> didn't occur to me that another Oracle instance might evaluate the
> where clause in a different order. Oh well, we live and learn.
>
> Stephen
--
Regards
Wolfgang Breitling
Centrex Consulting Corporation
www.centrexcc.com
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
