Re: Poorly performing query and 10053 trace
- From: Niall Litchfield <niall.litchfield@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Mladen Gogala <gogala@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:37:44 +0000
On 1/13/06, Mladen Gogala <gogala@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Not wanting to diminish Jonathan's exquisite book, there is also an
> excellent article by Mr. Wolfgang Breitling, on http://www.centrexcc.com.
> The description is excellent and immediately usable.
I can't believe I forgot that one.
--
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
http://www.niall.litchfield.dial.pipex.com
- References:
- RE: Overhead to consistent gets?
- From: Kevin Closson
- Poorly performing query and 10053 trace
- From: Ken Naim
- Re: Poorly performing query and 10053 trace
- From: Niall Litchfield
- Re: Poorly performing query and 10053 trace
- From: Mladen Gogala
Other related posts:
- » Poorly performing query and 10053 trace
- » Re: Poorly performing query and 10053 trace
- » Re: Poorly performing query and 10053 trace
- » Re: Poorly performing query and 10053 trace
- » Re: Poorly performing query and 10053 trace
- » Re: Poorly performing query and 10053 trace
- » Re: Poorly performing query and 10053 trace
- » Re: Poorly performing query and 10053 trace
- » Re: Poorly performing query and 10053 trace
- » Re: Poorly performing query and 10053 trace
- » RE: Poorly performing query and 10053 trace
- RE: Overhead to consistent gets?
- From: Kevin Closson
- Poorly performing query and 10053 trace
- From: Ken Naim
- Re: Poorly performing query and 10053 trace
- From: Niall Litchfield
- Re: Poorly performing query and 10053 trace
- From: Mladen Gogala