RE: Poor Performance of undo space management in 10.2 - bug info
- From: "Allen, Brandon" <Brandon.Allen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <john.hallas@xxxxxxxxxx>, "oracle-l" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2008 10:26:54 -0700
Thanks John, just a small correction - I searched for 5387030.1 and got
"no hits" so I think 5387030.8 is the one we need to use:
Subject: Bug 5387030 - Automatic tuning of undo_retention causes
unusual extra space allocation
Doc ID
<https://metalink.oracle.com/help/usaeng/Search/search.html#file> :
Note:5387030.8
Regards,
Brandon
________________________________
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John Hallas
. . .
Searching on Metalink showed Note 5387030.1
. . .
Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or
attachments hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not
consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and
other information in this message that do not relate to the official business
of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it.
- References:
- Poor Performance of undo space management in 10.2 - bug info
- From: John Hallas
Other related posts:
- » Poor Performance of undo space management in 10.2 - bug info
- » Re: Poor Performance of undo space management in 10.2 - bug info
- » RE: Poor Performance of undo space management in 10.2 - bug info
- » RE: Poor Performance of undo space management in 10.2 - bug info
- » Re: Poor Performance of undo space management in 10.2 - bug info
- » Re: Poor Performance of undo space management in 10.2 - bug info
- Poor Performance of undo space management in 10.2 - bug info
- From: John Hallas