Re: Please advice sql server vs. Oracle
- From: "Nuno Souto" <dbvision@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2004 22:35:28 +1000
----- Original Message -----
From: "Niall Litchfield" <n-litchfield@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 10:14 PM
Subject: RE: Please advice sql server vs. Oracle
>of rman. Obviously if you chose not to use multiple datafiles and
filegroups then you can't use this feature, but the same would be true in
Oracle if you put everything in one tablespace with one datafile. I believe
that this is new with ss2k - i.e. ss7 doesn't allow this.
I do seem to recall reading in their doco that
they definitely do not support partial restores
nor online restores. Which makes partial backups
all but redundant? Multiple or single filegroups
notwithstanding.
> You'll see that I've also had a discussion with Dan Morgan on usenet about
mssql and it does sound like I'm turning into an ms apologist, I'm not,
honest guv. On the other hand I'm not an Oracle apologist either - if it
does the job it does the job, and don't let
Absolutely. No objections here. If anything, the mob
I work with is more than bending to .NET and SS2K.
Rather than the J2EE silly environment and Oracle.
And between us that no one from Oracle can hear(!!!!),
quite rightly so!
Personally if Oracle gets beaten around the head in the next
few years, I'd rather it was by M$ than by IBM. Quite frankly.
Cheers
Nuno Souto
in sunny Sydney, Australia
dbvision@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Other related posts:
