> -----Original Message----- > From: Rich.Jesse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Sent: 30 March 2004 19:48 > To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; Rich.Jesse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: Please advice sql server vs. Oracle > > > I was wondering why they would site TPC numbers from 1997. > Informix all the > way! I wondered the same thing, but then IIRC SQLServer was ruling the TPC roost in 2002 - and Oracle folks were busy explaining that it was a meaningless benchmark <irony> I'm not sure if it remains a meaningless benchmark now 10g is on top </irony> I thought it was a pretty good paper - though I was intrigued by the method used to determine how many dbas a site needed with dbas servicing not databases but users. Cheers Niall Litchfield Oracle DBA Audit Commission +44 117 975 7805 ********************************************************************** This email contains information intended for the addressee only. It may be confidential and may be the subject of legal and/or professional privilege. Any dissemination, distribution, copyright or use of this communication without prior permission of the sender is strictly prohibited. ********************************************************************** ---------------------------------------------------------------- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com ---------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line. -- Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html -----------------------------------------------------------------