Re: Partitioning problems - Oracle 8.1.7.4
- From: "jaromir nemec" <jaromir@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <Tony.Adolph@xxxxxx>, <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 21:49:14 +0100
Hi Tony,
> Because I have a global PK index I thought
> that letting the table grow would
> have an adverse affect on performance for this index, so archiving a
> partition off would make sense.
Yes, that is true, but on the other side you loose the control of
uniqueness; a duplicated record could be re-entered after archiving the
former one.
If you check the unique constraint (i.e. non of the records in the temporary
table exists in the partitioned table) *before* each exchange partition
(and you move the duplicated records in an exception table before the
exchange) you probably don't need the global index at all.
Regards
Jaromir
----- Original Message -----
From: <Tony.Adolph@xxxxxx>
To: <jaromir@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 11:14 AM
Subject: Re: Partitioning problems - Oracle 8.1.7.4
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- References:
- Re: Partitioning problems - Oracle 8.1.7.4
- From: Tony . Adolph
Other related posts:
- » Partitioning problems - Oracle 8.1.7.4
- » Re: Partitioning problems - Oracle 8.1.7.4
- » Re: Partitioning problems - Oracle 8.1.7.4
- » Re: Partitioning problems - Oracle 8.1.7.4
- » Re: Partitioning problems - Oracle 8.1.7.4
- » Re: Partitioning problems - Oracle 8.1.7.4
- » Re: Partitioning problems - Oracle 8.1.7.4
- Re: Partitioning problems - Oracle 8.1.7.4
- From: Tony . Adolph