RE: Oracle's relationships with expert DBAs (and the rest of us mere mortals)
- From: "Freeman, Donald" <dofreeman@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <mln@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <mvetmp-ora@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 09:26:26 -0400
Can you elaborate on the "Then, of course, they also wanted RAC, and that's
where the
whole financial wagon went South?"
We are testing RHL 3 with a view to replace our Windows OS. We are doing this
on a single node now but eventually would have to RAC it and retest. Is there
some kind of complication using RAC on linux?
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Mogens Nørrgaard
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 5:30 PM
To: mvetmp-ora@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Oracle's relationships with expert DBAs (and the rest of us mere
mortals)
Which, unfortunately, seems to guarantee that in general Solaris will be
replaced by something more unstable out there.
Funny? Only if you're twisted.
Good for us? Only if we're willing to change.
Good for our country? Oh yes. GDP will increase, just as it does when we
have many traffic accidents.
When a large customer of ours went from HP/UX to Linux, we all expected
to see savings. Perhaps one day we will, but to begin with, the HP
support/upgrade stuff on Linux was - surprise - about the same price as
on HP/UX. Then, of course, they also wanted RAC, and that's where the
whole financial wagon went South.
Mogens
MVE wrote:
>Proving that it's takes less work to run ORACLE on Solaris LONG TERM
>(in this case > 10 years).
>
>- Vitaliy
>--
>//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
