Re: Oracle recommends rebuilding IOTs in AQ to reduce redo

FIFO
10.2.0.1 
single row queue
 -------------- Original message ----------------------
From: "Greg Rahn" <greg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> The coalesce would be a better option IMO (I've personally used this
> as a recommendation from the AQ dev team) and it can be done while the
> workload is in progress, while a rebuild requires the queues to be
> stopped.
> 
> Another recommendation I received is *not* to use ASSM tablespaces for
> the queues.
> 
> What db version is this?
> What is the queue navigation type (first or next message)?
> Are you doing single row or array enqueues/dequeues?
> 
> 
> On 1/6/08, Jonathan Lewis <jonathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > In simple indexes, the optimum solution to this type of problem
> > is usually a coalesce, rather than a rebuild. Given that Queues
> > are IOTs that you're not really supposed to know about, it's
> > not too surprising that Oracle has suggested a rebuild instead.
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> 
> Greg Rahn
> http://structureddata.org

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Other related posts: