Hmmm... How many bit's of MS Misinformation with respect to Oracle can you find in this gem of a document? Just looking at it for about 2 min's I've already found 2 glaring technical inaccuracies. The technical comparison between MS and Oracle makes it almost sound like MS had this great idea and Oracle just kind of "caught on"... Holly rewrite history Batman!! RF Robert G. Freeman Author: Oracle Database 11g New Features (Oracle Press) Portable DBA: Oracle (Oracle Press) Oracle Database 10g New Features (Oracle Press) Oracle9i RMAN Backup and Recovery (Oracle Press) Oracle9i New Feature Blog: http://robertgfreeman.blogspot.com (Oracle Press) ----- Original Message ---- From: "Allen, Brandon" <Brandon.Allen@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: gints.plivna@xxxxxxxxx; jkstill@xxxxxxxxx; rjoralist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2008 2:28:29 PM Subject: RE: Oracle out the door Here is an interesting article on this functionality in SQL 2K5: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms345124.aspx Especially pertinent to this thread is the section titled "Migration to a Common Database Technology" Regards, Brandon -----Original Message----- From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gints Plivna SQL Server 2005 has new isolation level snapshot isolation Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or attachments hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions, conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. -- //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l -- //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l