RE: Oracle experts are disgusted with SQL Server User Group
- From: "Aragon, Gabriel (GE Commercial Finance)" <gabriel.aragon@xxxxxx>
- To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 15:50:17 -0500
I'm not very sure about the legal stuff, but I agree about the moral and =
ethical issue, someone that is making money from other's effort should =
at least notify and ask permission from the author, and is still worse =
when he claims that Tom is "our technologist".=20
BTW, how could someone get the MVP award doing things like this?
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Post, Ethan
Sent: Jueves, 02 de Diciembre de 2004 01:21 p.m.
To: DGoulet@xxxxxxxx; oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Oracle experts are disgusted with SQL Server User Group
Not sure I agree, I do think that the "bait" and "hook" technique that
SSWUG is using is deceptive. However, if I wanted to publish a
newsletter that is simply a set of links and what I think about them and
charge people for that then I should be free to do that. It takes time
and effort to sift through good material and bad material as well as
simply find new/good material on the web. This time and effort is legit
and people should be able to charge for this. I can't publish the
materials in the newsletter or host the materials but linking should be
fine. In this sense SSWUG is just acting as a glorified search engine.
If I want to link to an article from a blog/newsletter whatever, it is
just not feasible that everyone go around and ask the author for
permission. I think there are some legal battles pertaining to this
stuff currently going on. I think people have been able to stop people
from linking, not sure.
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Goulet, Dick
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 1:10 PM
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Oracle experts are disgusted with SQL Server User Group
Well, I'll agree with Don. SSWUG would appear to have crossed a
moral/ethical line selling pointers to data that can otherwise be
obtained for free & making money off what others have placed in the
public domain. I'm no lawyer so I won't comment of the legal aspects.
I think they should have at least asked the authors for permission
first. At least Don has not placed his scripts in the public domain so
he has a right to sell them. Unless you want to do the research &
stitching yourself, which I believe if three fourths of the fun.
Dick Goulet
Senior Oracle DBA
Oracle Certified 8i DBA
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Oracle experts are disgusted with SQL Server User Group
- From: Niall Litchfield
Other related posts:
- » Oracle experts are disgusted with SQL Server User Group
- » Re: Oracle experts are disgusted with SQL Server User Group
- » RE: Oracle experts are disgusted with SQL Server User Group
- » RE: Oracle experts are disgusted with SQL Server User Group
- » RE: Oracle experts are disgusted with SQL Server User Group
- » RE: Oracle experts are disgusted with SQL Server User Group
- » RE: Oracle experts are disgusted with SQL Server User Group
- » RE: Oracle experts are disgusted with SQL Server User Group
- » RE: Oracle experts are disgusted with SQL Server User Group
- » RE: Oracle experts are disgusted with SQL Server User Group
- » RE: Oracle experts are disgusted with SQL Server User Group
- » Re: Oracle experts are disgusted with SQL Server User Group
- » Re: Oracle experts are disgusted with SQL Server User Group
- » Re: Oracle experts are disgusted with SQL Server User Group
- » RE: Oracle experts are disgusted with SQL Server User Group
- » RE: Oracle experts are disgusted with SQL Server User Group
- Re: Oracle experts are disgusted with SQL Server User Group
- From: Niall Litchfield