RE: Oracle experts are disgusted with SQL Server User Group

  • From: "Post, Ethan" <Ethan.Post@xxxxxx>
  • To: <nsouto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 14:26:46 -0600

I think it's time we requested a response from=20

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=3Den&lr=3D&group=3Dcomp.databases.ms-s=
qlser
ver

Must be a few happy customers there.

-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Nuno Souto
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 2:17 PM
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Oracle experts are disgusted with SQL Server User Group

On Fri, December 3, 2004 6:09 am, Goulet, Dick said:
>  Well, I'll agree with Don.  SSWUG would appear to have crossed a
> moral/ethical line selling pointers to data that can otherwise be
> obtained for free & making money off what others have placed in the
> public domain.  I'm no lawyer so I won't comment of the legal aspects.
> I think they should have at least asked the authors for permission
> first.

How about mis-representing Tom as their technologist?
This web site kind of gels it all about SS, isn't it?
All about deception.



Cheers
Nuno Souto
nsouto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Other related posts: