Re: Oracle and DST changes
- From: "GovindanK" <gkatteri@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "Mark Strickland" <strickland.mark@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 16:27:14 -0800
The one off patch which Oracle is suggesting is 4689959 per Metalink Note
359145.1 ; You would need to patch Solaris as well.
[1]http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-26-102178-1 if not
already done.
I recommend you take a look at Table 2 of Note:359145.1 which in turn leads to
Note:396387.1 for Solaris 64-Bit.
HTH
GovindanK
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 15:58:49 -0800, "Mark Strickland"
<strickland.mark@xxxxxxxxx> said:
Note #402742.1 explains the issue pretty well. I didn't know that there
actually is a one-off patch available for some versions of Oracle on some
platforms. I'm undecided about whether or not I'm going to apply the one-off
patch. Looks like a very low-risk patch. I certainly cannot consider moving
to the [2]10.2.0.3 patchset. We're are on [3]10.1.0.5 ( Solaris 9 64-bit), do
not use java inside the database, do not use TSTZ or TSLTZ outside of the data
dictionary and the TZ_OFFSET function is not used, BUT we are in an affected
time zone ( U.S. Pacific). If the data dictionary columns that use TSTZ or
TSLTZ are only related to the Scheduler, then it seems low risk to me to let
the Scheduler be off by an hour for a few weeks. We do not use the Scheduler
for any application-related things. It's just the automatic statistics
gathering that's affected as far as I can tell. I'll be interested in hearing
more about what folks decide to do.
Regards,
Mark Strickland
Seattle, WA
References
1. http://sunsolve.sun.com/search/document.do?assetkey=1-26-102178-1
2. http://10.2.0.3/
3. http://10.1.0.5/
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: Oracle and DST changes
- From: Mercadante, Thomas F \(LABOR\)
- References:
- Oracle and DST changes
- From: Fedock, John \(KAM.RHQ\)
- Re: Oracle and DST changes
- From: GovindanK
- Re: Oracle and DST changes
- From: Mark Strickland
Other related posts:
- » Oracle and DST changes
- » Re: Oracle and DST changes
- » Re: Oracle and DST changes
- » Re: Oracle and DST changes
- » Re: Oracle and DST changes
- » RE: Oracle and DST changes
- » RE: Oracle and DST changes
- » Re: Oracle and DST changes
- » RE: Oracle and DST changes
- » RE: Oracle and DST changes
- » RE: Oracle and DST changes
- » Re: Oracle and DST changes
- » RE: Oracle and DST changes
- » RE: Oracle and DST changes
- » Re: Oracle and DST changes
- » RE: Oracle and DST changes
- » RE: Oracle and DST changes
- » RE: Oracle and DST changes
- » Re: Oracle and DST changes
- » RE: Oracle and DST changes
- » RE: Oracle and DST changes
- » RE: Oracle and DST changes
- » RE: Oracle and DST changes
- » Re: Oracle and DST changes
- » RE: Oracle and DST changes
- » RE: Oracle and DST changes
- » Re: Oracle and DST changes
- » RE: Oracle and DST changes
- » Re: Oracle and DST changes
- » Re: Oracle and DST changes
- » RE: Oracle and DST changes
- » RE: Oracle and DST changes
- » RE: Oracle and DST changes
- » RE: Oracle and DST changes
- » RE: Oracle and DST changes
- » Re: Oracle and DST changes
- » RE: Oracle and DST changes
- » RE: Oracle and DST changes
- » Re: Oracle and DST changes
- » Re: Oracle and DST changes
- » RE: Oracle and DST changes
- » RE: Oracle and DST changes
- » Re: Oracle and DST changes
- » Re: Oracle and DST changes
- » RE: Oracle and DST changes
- » RE: Oracle and DST changes
- » Re: Oracle and DST changes
- » Re: Oracle and DST changes
- RE: Oracle and DST changes
- From: Mercadante, Thomas F \(LABOR\)
- Oracle and DST changes
- From: Fedock, John \(KAM.RHQ\)
- Re: Oracle and DST changes
- From: GovindanK
- Re: Oracle and DST changes
- From: Mark Strickland