Re: Oracle and DST changes
- From: "Mark Strickland" <strickland.mark@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 10:17:53 -0800
I just realized that on one of my dev/test servers, Oracle was never
upgraded from 10.1.0.3 to 10.1.0.5 (egg on face). There is no DST patch for
10.1.0.3 but I compared the old versions of the timezone files between the
two patchsets and they are identical so I copied the new timezone files from
10.1.0.5 to 10.1.0.3 and called it good. The test query does return the
correct time. I don't like doing spur-of-the-moment upgrades and this
particular server and database are expected to be sunsetted sometime this
century, so I decided not to quickly upgrade it. I may decide to do that
later.
So, if you have 10.1.0.3 and can't upgrade to a higher 10gR1 patchset, there
appears to be a workaround. If I encounter side-effects, I'll be sure to
update the list.
Regards,
Mark Strickland
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: Oracle and DST changes
- From: Mercadante, Thomas F \(LABOR\)
- Re: Oracle and DST changes
- From: Barbara Baker
- Re: Oracle and DST changes
- From: Jared Still
- References:
- RE: Oracle and DST changes
- From: Mercadante, Thomas F \(LABOR\)
- RE: Oracle and DST changes
- From: Sam Bootsma
- Re: Oracle and DST changes
- From: Mark Strickland
Other related posts:
- » Oracle and DST changes
- » Re: Oracle and DST changes
- » Re: Oracle and DST changes
- » Re: Oracle and DST changes
- » Re: Oracle and DST changes
- » RE: Oracle and DST changes
- » RE: Oracle and DST changes
- » Re: Oracle and DST changes
- » RE: Oracle and DST changes
- » RE: Oracle and DST changes
- » RE: Oracle and DST changes
- » Re: Oracle and DST changes
- » RE: Oracle and DST changes
- » RE: Oracle and DST changes
- » Re: Oracle and DST changes
- » RE: Oracle and DST changes
- » RE: Oracle and DST changes
- » RE: Oracle and DST changes
- » Re: Oracle and DST changes
- » RE: Oracle and DST changes
- » RE: Oracle and DST changes
- » RE: Oracle and DST changes
- » RE: Oracle and DST changes
- » Re: Oracle and DST changes
- » RE: Oracle and DST changes
- » RE: Oracle and DST changes
- » Re: Oracle and DST changes
- » RE: Oracle and DST changes
- » Re: Oracle and DST changes
- » Re: Oracle and DST changes
- » RE: Oracle and DST changes
- » RE: Oracle and DST changes
- » RE: Oracle and DST changes
- » RE: Oracle and DST changes
- » RE: Oracle and DST changes
- » Re: Oracle and DST changes
- » RE: Oracle and DST changes
- » RE: Oracle and DST changes
- » Re: Oracle and DST changes
- » Re: Oracle and DST changes
- » RE: Oracle and DST changes
- » RE: Oracle and DST changes
- » Re: Oracle and DST changes
- » Re: Oracle and DST changes
- » RE: Oracle and DST changes
- » RE: Oracle and DST changes
- » Re: Oracle and DST changes
- » Re: Oracle and DST changes
- RE: Oracle and DST changes
- From: Mercadante, Thomas F \(LABOR\)
- Re: Oracle and DST changes
- From: Barbara Baker
- Re: Oracle and DST changes
- From: Jared Still
- RE: Oracle and DST changes
- From: Mercadante, Thomas F \(LABOR\)
- RE: Oracle and DST changes
- From: Sam Bootsma
- Re: Oracle and DST changes
- From: Mark Strickland