Re: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC?
- From: "Charles Schultz" <sacrophyte@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: breitliw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 21:10:48 -0600
Larger shops that like to buy the whole kit & kaboodle, even if some of the
stuff is never used. Fortunately, we do use AWR, but I agree about
statspack.
Can one force Grid Control (or dbconsole for that matter) to use statspack
data instead of AWR? I realize they are different animals and the statspack
is "limited".
On 1/2/07, Wolfgang Breitling <breitliw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
At 06:20 PM 1/2/2007, Job Miller wrote:
>
>The biggest downside to SE that I see is no Diagnostics Pack (AWR)
>data available to you.
>
>so now if you throw in RAC, you have any more of a need to
>understand/diagnose the underlying wait data, but no convenient
>mechanism like AWR to collect all of that for you.
I am curious. How many have actually licensed the Diagnostics Pack.
Of course you can still use its older cousin, Statspack, for free even in
SE.
Regards
Wolfgang Breitling
Centrex Consulting Corporation
www.centrexcc.com
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
Charles Schultz
- References:
- RE: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC?
- From: Robert Freeman
- RE: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC?
- From: Job Miller
- RE: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC?
- From: Wolfgang Breitling
Other related posts:
- » Oracle Standard Edition & RAC?
- » RE: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC?
- » RE: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC?
- » RE: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC?
- » RE: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC?
- » Re: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC?
- » RE: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC?
- » Re: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » Re: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » RE: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » Re: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC?
- » RE: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » RE: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » Re: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » Re: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » RE: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » Re: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » RE: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » Re: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » RE: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » Re: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » RE: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » Re: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » Re: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » Re: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » Re: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » Re: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » Re: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » Re: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » Re: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » Re: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » RE: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » RE: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » RE: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » RE: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » RE: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » RE: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » RE: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » Re: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » RE: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » RE: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » RE: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » Re: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » RE: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » Re: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
At 06:20 PM 1/2/2007, Job Miller wrote: > >The biggest downside to SE that I see is no Diagnostics Pack (AWR) >data available to you. > >so now if you throw in RAC, you have any more of a need to >understand/diagnose the underlying wait data, but no convenient >mechanism like AWR to collect all of that for you. I am curious. How many have actually licensed the Diagnostics Pack. Of course you can still use its older cousin, Statspack, for free even in SE. Regards Wolfgang Breitling Centrex Consulting Corporation www.centrexcc.com -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- RE: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC?
- From: Robert Freeman
- RE: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC?
- From: Job Miller
- RE: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC?
- From: Wolfgang Breitling