Re: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- From: "Niall Litchfield" <niall.litchfield@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Andrey.Kriushin@xxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2007 09:31:53 +0000
On 1/5/07, Andrey Kriushin <Andrey.Kriushin@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
I know now, that use_indirect_data_buffers leads to ~doubling the space
required for buffer headers.
The whole experience sounds horrible. I don't know about you but I'm old
enough to remember himem.sys, emm386 and so on in the good old 16bit days,
but not old enough to know what happened at the 8-16bit transition
fortunately - didn't we just get new operating systems then. Why we insist
on repeating this stuff is just bizarre to me. It's not even as though 64bit
is an especially new technology.
--
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
http://www.orawin.info
- References:
- Re: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- From: Niall Litchfield
- RE: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- From: Kevin Closson
- Re: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- From: Alex Gorbachev
- Re: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- From: Niall Litchfield
- Re: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- From: Andrey Kriushin
Other related posts:
- » Oracle Standard Edition & RAC?
- » RE: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC?
- » RE: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC?
- » RE: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC?
- » RE: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC?
- » Re: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC?
- » RE: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC?
- » Re: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » Re: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » RE: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » Re: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC?
- » RE: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » RE: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » Re: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » Re: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » RE: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » Re: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » RE: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » Re: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » RE: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » Re: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » RE: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » Re: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » Re: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » Re: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » Re: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » Re: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » Re: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » Re: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » Re: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » Re: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » RE: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » RE: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » RE: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » RE: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » RE: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » RE: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » RE: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » Re: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » RE: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » RE: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » RE: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » Re: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » RE: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- » Re: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
I know now, that use_indirect_data_buffers leads to ~doubling the space required for buffer headers.
- Re: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- From: Niall Litchfield
- RE: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- From: Kevin Closson
- Re: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- From: Alex Gorbachev
- Re: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- From: Niall Litchfield
- Re: Oracle Standard Edition & RAC
- From: Andrey Kriushin