RE: Oracle RAC cost justification?
- From: "Khemmanivanh, Somckit" <somckit.khemmanivanh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "Jared Still" <jkstill@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 15:10:44 -0700
I'm really not interested in arguing anymore about what constitutes
HA...Most of the time the level of HA required is driven by business
requirements anyway...
Thanks!
________________________________
From: Jared Still [mailto:jkstill@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2005 3:02 PM
To: Khemmanivanh, Somckit
Cc: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Oracle RAC cost justification?
On 6/2/05, Khemmanivanh, Somckit <somckit.khemmanivanh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Whoa, a SAN is non-redundant???
I agree it could still be a SPOF but it certainly is redundant
component wise...
Maybe so.
If your SAN goes down, you are out of business, regardless of
the number of redundant components it houses.
SANs will and do fail.
--
Jared Still
Certifiable Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl Evangelist
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
