Re: Oracle CBO question

From: "Alberto Dell'Era" <alberto.dellera@xxxxxxxxx>
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2007 21:08:30 +0200

I've plugged ' oracle "16 table join" ' in google and I've found that
until 7.0, *SqlServer* used to have this 16 tables limitation.

Curious :)

On 6/7/07, Alberto Dell'Era <alberto.dellera@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 6/7/07, Jared Still <jkstill@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
(snip)
> Why the number 16 was chosen I am not sure.
> Perhaps someone speculated there was a 4 bit limitation?
(snip)

It's not the first time I hear about this "16" myth, it would be nice,
for historical reasons, to know about the source.



--
Alberto Dell'Era
"dulce bellum inexpertis"
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l




--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Follow-Ups:

RE: Oracle CBO question
From: Igor Neyman

References:
- Oracle CBO question
  - From: Joel.Patterson
- Re: Oracle CBO question
  - From: Jared Still
- Re: Oracle CBO question
  - From: Alberto Dell'Era

Other related posts:

Browse oracle-l