Re: Oracle Book Mal-practice...

From: Toon Koppelaars <toon.koppelaars@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: mzito@xxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 18:34:19 +0200

On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 6:30 PM, Matthew Zito <mzito@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> All that being said, there’s so many layers of abstraction today already,
> and more on the way, that trying to optimize like that is futile, and almost
> certainly not worth it.

Even more so, if you take into consideration that today's SGA's (the buffer
cache part of it) can be sized such that most block requests will be LIO's
anyway (instead of PIO's).

-- 
Toon Koppelaars
RuleGen BV
+31-615907269
Toon.Koppelaars@xxxxxxxxxxx
www.RuleGen.com
TheHelsinkiDeclaration.blogspot.com

(co)Author: "Applied Mathematics for Database Professionals"
www.RuleGen.com/pls/apex/f?p=14265:13

Follow-Ups:

RE: Oracle Book Mal-practice...
From: Matthew Zito

References:
- Your experience - positive or negative - with Oracle on VMWare...
  - From: Robert Freeman
- RE: Your experience - positive or negative - with Oracle on VMWare...
  - From: Allen, Brandon
- Re: Your experience - positive or negative - with Oracle on VMWare...
  - From: Robert Freeman
- RE: Your experience - positive or negative - with Oracle on VMWare...
  - From: Matthew Zito
- Oracle Book Mal-practice...
  - From: Robert Freeman
- Re: Oracle Book Mal-practice...
  - From: Nuno Souto
- RE: Oracle Book Mal-practice...
  - From: Kline.Michael
- Re: Oracle Book Mal-practice...
  - From: Thomas Day
- RE: Oracle Book Mal-practice...
  - From: Mercadante, Thomas F (LABOR)
- RE: Oracle Book Mal-practice...
  - From: Matthew Zito

Re: Oracle Book Mal-practice...

Other related posts: