Re: Oracle 9.2 changes in INIT

  • From: Niall Litchfield <niall.litchfield@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 22:03:26 +0100

Yes it was. It isn't what it says though. I did log an iTar and it was
accepted as a documentation bug in the end - initially they told me to
use maxextents unlimited :(. The docs are revised in 10g. This is how
it is supposed to work, and hey it did.

 -- 
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
http://www.niall.litchfield.dial.pipex.com


----- Original Message -----
From: Jacques Kilchoer <jacques.kilchoer@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 11:09:18 -0700
Subject: RE: Oracle 9.2 changes in INIT
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx


Weren't those numbers the maximum number of extents for a segment in
7.1 (before unlimited extents)?


Table 7-6 Maximum Number of Extents for Each Database

Typical Block Sizes   Number of Extents 
 2 KB                       121
 4 KB                       255
 8 KB                       504
16 KB                      1032
32 KB                      2070

________________________________
Jared.Still@xxxxxxxxxxx
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to:  oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Other related posts: