Re: Oracle 911 Article
- From: "Daniel W. Fink" <Daniel.Fink@xxxxxxx>
- To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 08:54:23 -0700
Jonathan Lewis wrote:
> Given that "The problem started when she wanted to
> know the average row length for a table." I think we
> can assume that the immediate fix to the problem was to
> get rid of the stats from the one table, so the database
> would go back to using RBO across the board.
It seems to me that the real problem is a DBA who did not know how to retrieve
average row length using SQL functions and did not understand the implications
of analyzing only one table in a schema. This may be the result of a company not
spending money on training, a person not taking the time to educate themselves,
etc. Sure, the symptom is fixed, but what happens when this DBA begins to add
db_block_buffers to achieve a 99.999% BCHR?
Dan
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Oracle 911 Article
- From: Carel-Jan Engel
- References:
- Re: Oracle 911 Article
- From: Michael Thomas
- Re[2]: Oracle 911 Article
- From: Jonathan Gennick
- Re: Re[2]: Oracle 911 Article
- From: Jonathan Lewis
Other related posts:
- » Oracle 911 Article
- » RE: Oracle 911 Article
- » Re: Oracle 911 Article
- » Re: Oracle 911 Article
- » RE: Oracle 911 Article
- » RE: Oracle 911 Article
- » Re: Oracle 911 Article
- » RE: Oracle 911 Article
- » Re: Oracle 911 Article
- » RE: Oracle 911 Article
- » Re: Oracle 911 Article
- » RE: Oracle 911 Article
- » RE: Oracle 911 Article
- » Re: Oracle 911 Article
- » Re: Oracle 911 Article
- » Re: Oracle 911 Article
- » RE: Oracle 911 Article
- » Re: Oracle 911 Article
- » RE: Oracle 911 Article
- » Re: Oracle 911 Article
- » RE: Oracle 911 Article
- » Re: Oracle 911 Article
- » RE: Oracle 911 Article
- » RE: Oracle 911 Article
- » Re: Oracle 911 Article
- » Re: Oracle 911 Article
- » Re: Oracle 911 Article
- » Re: Oracle 911 Article
- » Re: Oracle 911 Article
- » Re: Oracle 911 Article
- » Re: Oracle 911 Article
- » Re: Oracle 911 Article
- Re: Oracle 911 Article
- From: Carel-Jan Engel
- Re: Oracle 911 Article
- From: Michael Thomas
- Re[2]: Oracle 911 Article
- From: Jonathan Gennick
- Re: Re[2]: Oracle 911 Article
- From: Jonathan Lewis