RE: Oracle 8i on Windows 2003

For what it's worth, I'm running a very old application under 7.3 on Win XP
Pro.  It's small and cost prohibitive to upgrade as long as it still runs.
It was built using Pro*COBOL and PowerObjects.

Marc.

-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Jared Still
Sent: Friday, December 10, 2004 3:25 PM
To: Niall Litchfield
Cc: stant_98@xxxxxxxxx; Oracle-L Freelists
Subject: Re: Oracle 8i on Windows 2003

On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 19:32:50 +0000, Niall Litchfield
<niall.litchfield@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I'd probably choose win2k, just because I know it works *and* there is
> a large similar installed base out there. My hunch is that win2k3
> would *work* but might be more unusual.

We're just trying to avoid installing a new server with Win2k,

> p.s. actually I'd probably test 9.2 and the 9i client, figuring I have
> more leverage over the app supplier than Oracle Corp, but that's just
> me.

Quite sure that will not work with this app.  If it isn't a v7 client,
it won't work.  Custom app, developer gone, no current source.

Nice, eh?


-- 
Jared Still
Certifiable Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl Evangelist
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l


--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Other related posts: