Re: Opatch rant

Yep, I saw this one on our HP-UX servers. I uninstalled Apache from most of 
our servers in response to the long list of security issues. After all, Rule 
1 of the Oracle's secure configuration doc is "Only install what is 
required", and we aren't using the Apache stuff.
Then, when I needed to use opatch, it wouldn't run until I put the perl 
module back in the Apache directory even though I had a working perl on the 
server and in my path. Fortunately, it's relatively easy to get the perl 
module back in place and after that, I went to 9.2.0.6 <http://9.2.0.6> and 
haven't had to mess with opatch since.

Robyn


On 5/20/05, Jared Still <jkstill@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Wanna see something interesting with opatch?
> *nix: perl -cw $ORACLE_HOME/OPatch/opatch.pl
> 
> Windoze: perl -cw %ORACLE_HOME%\opatch\opatch.pl
> 
> Anyone else have trouble with opatch and Perl 5.8.3?
> 
> Windows 2003
> Perl 5.8.3
> Opatch 1.0....52
> 
> Opatch either exits with an error code that is a very long negative 
> number,
> or just spits out its copyright information and quits.
> 
> Interestingly, installing Perl 5.0.00503 in OH/Apache cures the problem, 
> as
> the opatch.bat script will find it there and it runs happily.
> 
> 5.8.3 seems to work fine on a Win2K box with the same version of opatch.
> 
> --
> Jared Still
> Certifiable Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl Evangelist
> 
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Other related posts: