Re: ORION num_disks
- From: "Greg Rahn" <greg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "Allen, Brandon" <Brandon.Allen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2008 13:17:11 -0700
I believe num_disks has to do with the number of I/O threads that are
spawned and num_large has to do with the number of outstanding I/Os
that are targeted to be issued.
For what I use the tool for (I/O bandwidth testing) I generally run
the sequential workload to get a best possible data point and then use
the rand workload to get numbers closer to what a PQ workload would
be.
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Allen, Brandon
<Brandon.Allen@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In the case of an advanced run like you have below with a specific point
> of 45 large IOs and 0 small IOs, I don't think the num_disks parameter
> does anything, but please let me know if I'm wrong.
--
Regards,
Greg Rahn
http://structureddata.org
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: ORION num_disks
- From: Allen, Brandon
- References:
- ORION num_disks
- From: LS Cheng
- Re: ORION num_disks
- From: Greg Rahn
- RE: ORION num_disks
- From: Allen, Brandon
Other related posts:
- » ORION num_disks
- » RE: ORION num_disks
- » Re: ORION num_disks
- » Re: ORION num_disks
- » Re: ORION num_disks
- » RE: ORION num_disks
- » Re: ORION num_disks
- » RE: ORION num_disks
- » RE: ORION num_disks
- » RE: ORION num_disks
- » RE: ORION num_disks
- » Re: ORION num_disks
- » RE: ORION num_disks
- RE: ORION num_disks
- From: Allen, Brandon
- ORION num_disks
- From: LS Cheng
- Re: ORION num_disks
- From: Greg Rahn
- RE: ORION num_disks
- From: Allen, Brandon