Re: OMS and Repository Preferences
- From: Hans Forbrich <fuzzy.graybeard@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 12:55:00 -0600
So my question is:
If the license for the database for OMR is included in the product being
monitored, as long as no options (eg: RAC) are involved: is the Standby
database for OMR - covered by DG Broker & Observer - also included [aka
free]?
If yes, then we have an opportunity to learn how to configure OMS,
and/or to learn how to use VIP under OMR.
I love learning opportunities.
/Hans
On 12/04/2012 9:36 AM, Kellyn Pot'vin wrote:
> Since without EM, we DBA's are often in the dark, I appreciate the proposal
> of RAC for the environment, but doesn't this kill the free licensing option
> that many companies take advantage of to keep costs down? I would prefer to
> use my EM monitoring and alert script vs. having to go to my manager and
> explain to him that I need more budget for licensing costs! Correct me if
> RAC is free for EM, but I see no documentation saying otherwise.
> Thanks!
>
> Kellyn Pot'Vin
> Senior Technical Consultant
> Enkitec
> DBAKevlar.com
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Tim Hall<tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: kellyn.potvin@xxxxxxxxx
> Cc: "Oracle- L@ Free Lists.org"<oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, April 12, 2012 9:09 AM
> Subject: Re: OMS and Repository Preferences
>
> Hi.
>
> Take a look at this:
>
> http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E24628_01/doc.121/e24473/ha_intro.htm#EMADM10659
>
> > From your description it sounds like you are only planning a level 1
> setup (1 repository instance and 1 OMS instance). If that is the case,
> I see very little benefit to having it on 2 machines, as opposed to 1.
> If either DB or OMS machine dies it's all gone anyway. Since the two
> servers in this setup provide no additional resilience, I would prefer
> a simpler solution of a single server myself.
>
> Of course, if the plan is to move to a more resilient solution in the
> future, it may alter my opinion somewhat.
>
> Cheers
>
> Tim...
>
> On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Kellyn Pot'vin<kellyn.potvin@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>> I know it's common for many folks to separate their OMS from their
>> repository for Enterprise Manager- I haven't been one to do this in the
>> past due to, OK, just going to say it, flaky network connectivity in
>> previous environments that would cause *false* communication alerts with the
>> OMS components to/from the repository. I now have new clients, new systems
>> to work on and at least two EM12c environments to build out in the near
>> future.
>> So here's my question:
>> What is your preference when building an Enterprise Manager environment? Do
>> you house the OMS and the repository on the same host or separately and I
>> want to know WHY you build it one way or the other, not just "It just should
>> be that way.. " :)
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Kellyn Pot'Vin
>> Senior Technical Consultant
>> Enkitec
>> DBAKevlar.com
>> --
>> //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>>
>>
> --
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
> --
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
