Re: ODG 10GR2
- From: David Turner <dnt9000@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Kevin Closson <kevinc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 21:50:30 -0700 (PDT)
We're planning on not using the broker. I wouldn't care about the unnecessary
switchovers if we could get them to go faster. I'm thinking we should just
perform failovers and use flash recovery to reestablish the replication between
the two databases.
Thx, Dave
----- Original Message ----
From: Kevin Closson <kevinc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: dnt9000@xxxxxxxxx; oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 3:49:35 PM
Subject: RE: ODG 10GR2
>>>
>>> <Bug:4404952> : DG BROKER DOES NOT SUPPORT COLD-FAILOVER CLUSTERS
>>>
>>> I was told my Oracle support that giving dataguard a vip
>>>makes it think that you're running RAC and that there is a
>>>request out to fix the problems. I spent well over a week
>>>wrestling with local_listener, sid parameter, etc because of
>>>this. We'll either yank VCS or the broker to fix this. Hope
Yank VCS? Your DG primary is in a VCS cold failover
cluster...won't you suffer unecessary switchovers in the
even of a node failure? Will you also get rid of the cluster?
Just wondering.
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
