RE: OCFS2
- From: "Jesse, Rich" <Rich.Jesse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <mgogala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <cmarquez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 12:10:27 -0500
Hmmm...
# uptime
12:08pm up 840 days, 5:38, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
# cat /etc/redhat-release
Red Hat Linux release 7.1 (Seawolf)
The box is running Oracle Names with an associated 8.1.7.4.0 region DB.
Too bad it's "HA" ONames partner has only been up 618 days...
Granted, this is just one example out of many, but I think a good one.
Rich
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mladen Gogala
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2005 3:19 PM
To: cmarquez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: OCFS2
Marquez, Chris wrote: RE: OCFS2
>
> I'm a firm believer in "you get what you pay for"...and with OCFS that
> is so true.
>
That, unfortunately, applies to Linux as well. Stability-wise, it's
nowhere near HP-UX, AIX or Solaris.
It's about as good as Winduhs server but much more convenient.
--
Mladen Gogala
Oracle DBA
Ext. 121
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
