RE: OCFS2

  • From: "Billy Verreynne (JW)" <VerreyB@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "Oracle Discussion List" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2005 07:44:03 +0200

I don't get this.. I installed OCFS 1.1 a while back. It simply
worked. And is still working. And is so darn useful I have envious
Unix HP-UX & Solaris sysadmin colleagues desperate for something
similar to use.

I used ASMlib with Powerpath and ran into all kinds of weird
intermittant I/O problems.. which the TAR finally suggesting were
"problems" (I call it plain bugs) in EMC's Powerpath. I lost about 4
weeks of production & development time as a result. Which I could not
afford to loose.

And now some of you complain about OCFS and make all kinds of
dispariging comments on the subject? If you have a gripe, please get
technical because I fail to find any value in a posting that just
bitches about a product.

--
Billy




~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This e-mail and its contents are subject to the Telkom SA Limited
e-mail legal notice available at
http://www.telkom.co.za/TelkomEMailLegalNotice.PDF
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Other related posts: