Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam
- From: David Ballester <ballester.david@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Matthew Zito <mzito@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2009 21:06:08 +0200
2009/7/6 Matthew Zito <mzito@xxxxxxxxxxx> > I think very on-topic, but if you read the article, they modified > PostgreSQL to be columnar instead of row-based. This holds up with another > school of thought from folks like Vertica that column-oriented databases are > the “way to go” to scale to these types of data sizes and ranges. Yet > another variant on the traditional RDBMS for specific uses. They also > mentioned that yahoo acquired the technology from a small startup, and then > adapted it. > > > > Matt > Yes, that's what I said that they get the postgresql source code and rebuild some part ( for example, major ACID code ) sorry for my english O:D. In anyway where I wanna focus is in the fact that, immo, no enteprise company has developed a solution to meet this hungry services, and each one has developed is own. D.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam
- From: Greg Rahn
- Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam
- References:
- No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam
- From: Sunil Kanderi
- Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam
- From: Nuno Souto
- RE: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam
- From: Matthew Zito
- Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam
- From: Nuno Souto
- RE: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam
- From: Matthew Zito
- Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam
- From: David Ballester
- RE: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam
- From: Matthew Zito
- No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam
Other related posts:
- » No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Sunil Kanderi
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Martin Berger
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Robert Freeman
- » RE: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Goulet, Richard
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Jared Still
- » RE: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Matthew Zito
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Cary Millsap
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Toon Koppelaars
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Robyn
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Niall Litchfield
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Nuno Souto
- » RE: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Matthew Zito
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Jared Still
- » RE: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Martin Brown
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Sunil Kanderi
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Pedro Alvarez Espinoza
- » RE: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Johnson, George
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Nuno Souto
- » RE: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Goulet, Richard
- » RE: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Matthew Zito
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - David Ballester
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - David Ballester
- » RE: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Matthew Zito
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - David Ballester
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Greg Rahn
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Nuno Souto
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Nuno Souto
- » RE: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Matthew Zito
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Nuno Souto