Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam
- From: Pedro Alvarez Espinoza <raindoctor@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: cary.millsap@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 13:56:44 -0700
I Date's remarks on the existing 'relational' dbms vendors are brilliant. However, is it practically possible to come up with O(1) joins? On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Cary Millsap <cary.millsap@xxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > After listening to Chris Date at the symposium last March, I'm more > convinced than ever that if (a) SQL were truly relational and (b) people > actually adhered to relational design principles, there would be a far > greater proportion of correctly-functioning high-speed applications in the > world today. > > Cary Millsap > Method R Corporation > http://method-r.com > >
- References:
- No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam
- From: Sunil Kanderi
- Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam
- From: Martin Berger
- Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam
- From: Cary Millsap
- No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam
Other related posts:
- » No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Sunil Kanderi
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Martin Berger
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Robert Freeman
- » RE: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Goulet, Richard
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Jared Still
- » RE: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Matthew Zito
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Cary Millsap
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Toon Koppelaars
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Robyn
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Niall Litchfield
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Nuno Souto
- » RE: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Matthew Zito
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Jared Still
- » RE: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Martin Brown
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Sunil Kanderi
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Pedro Alvarez Espinoza
- » RE: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Johnson, George
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Nuno Souto
- » RE: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Goulet, Richard
- » RE: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Matthew Zito
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - David Ballester
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - David Ballester
- » RE: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Matthew Zito
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - David Ballester
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Greg Rahn
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Nuno Souto
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Nuno Souto
- » RE: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Matthew Zito
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Nuno Souto