Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam
- From: Jared Still <jkstill@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: mzito@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2009 10:24:31 -0700
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 10:15 AM, Matthew Zito <mzito@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > So why can't we have both? > > Matt > No reason to not have both, and the companies you mention have very good reasons for using the tools they do. Matt, I think your perspective may be a bit different than many of the respondents to this thread. Many DBA's have to deal with developers that (speaking only of databases here) know how to use a hammer, and every data storage solution looks like a nail. Jared
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam
- From: Martin Brown
- RE: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam
- References:
- No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam
- From: Sunil Kanderi
- Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam
- From: Nuno Souto
- RE: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam
- From: Matthew Zito
- No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam
Other related posts:
- » No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Sunil Kanderi
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Martin Berger
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Robert Freeman
- » RE: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Goulet, Richard
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Jared Still
- » RE: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Matthew Zito
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Cary Millsap
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Toon Koppelaars
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Robyn
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Niall Litchfield
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Nuno Souto
- » RE: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Matthew Zito
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Jared Still
- » RE: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Martin Brown
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Sunil Kanderi
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Pedro Alvarez Espinoza
- » RE: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Johnson, George
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Nuno Souto
- » RE: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Goulet, Richard
- » RE: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Matthew Zito
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - David Ballester
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - David Ballester
- » RE: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Matthew Zito
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - David Ballester
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Greg Rahn
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Nuno Souto
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Nuno Souto
- » RE: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Matthew Zito
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Nuno Souto