No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam
- From: Sunil Kanderi <sunil.kanderi@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Oracle-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 11:47:29 -0700
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9135086 Interesting article in ComputerWorld about the NoSQL movement. Most of my DBA experience has been primarily related to large ERP applications and recently had to start supporting Java Development environment and it almost feels like a totally different world. Looking at ORM tools like Hibernate, which is very popular with Java crowd, it baffles me as to how little SQL one really needs to know to get by with and their general aversion to understanding SQL. At this point these NoSQL alternatives do not seem to apply to the enterprises, but mostly to Web 2.0 based applications. However things could change and was curious to know what the broader Oracle community thinks about these alternatives especially with Cloud computing and databases on the cloud, fast catching on within the enterprises. At my work place, we are migrating all out hardware/database infrastructure to a hosted platform and I wouldn't be surprised if within the next three years all our applications being totally supported on a cloud platform. This will undoubtedly have a big impact on the infrastructure folks, be it OS/hardware or Database. Here is a good discussion on the article sited above. http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=683807 Best, Sunil. http://www.linkedin.com/in/sunilkanderi
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam
- From: Martin Berger
- Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam
- From: Robert Freeman
- RE: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam
- From: Goulet, Richard
- Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam
- From: Jared Still
- Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam
- From: Nuno Souto
- Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam
Other related posts:
- » No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Sunil Kanderi
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Martin Berger
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Robert Freeman
- » RE: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Goulet, Richard
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Jared Still
- » RE: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Matthew Zito
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Cary Millsap
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Toon Koppelaars
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Robyn
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Niall Litchfield
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Nuno Souto
- » RE: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Matthew Zito
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Jared Still
- » RE: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Martin Brown
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Sunil Kanderi
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Pedro Alvarez Espinoza
- » RE: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Johnson, George
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Nuno Souto
- » RE: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Goulet, Richard
- » RE: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Matthew Zito
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - David Ballester
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - David Ballester
- » RE: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Matthew Zito
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - David Ballester
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Greg Rahn
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Nuno Souto
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Nuno Souto
- » RE: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Matthew Zito
- » Re: No to SQL? Anti-database movement gains steam - Nuno Souto