Re: New oracle myths?
- From: Niall Litchfield <niall.litchfield@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2004 15:30:20 +0100
On Tue, 31 Aug 2004 12:53:41 -0800, Darrell Landrum <darrell@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Take a look at:
>
> http://www.dbazine.com/burleson25.shtml
There do seem to be rather a lot of ideas in that particular document
- none of which seem to have anything to do with RAC Global Block
Management.
On the Myths section, I am not aware that any of those of us who have
spoken/published on the subject have suggested that the myths are
malicious in foundation, speaking for myself its certainly more of a
case of well these are some of the ideas that are around that have
been less than helpful to me (in some cases downright misleading), and
hey we can all test the Oracle platform for free, and get good
reliable repeatable data out of it so isn't a better way forward to
test out and document some of these practices.
--
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
http://www.niall.litchfield.dial.pipex.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Other related posts:
