I don't know about the smiley :) But I opened the source of the doc, and it seems that it has errors in it. Otherwise, it looks like having legitimate information. - Vlad On 6/12/05, rjamya <rjamya@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Sorry folks, so far only Mladen seems to have noticed the smiley ... the > document is indeed empty. So much for the Metalink review process. > I couldn't resist sending that to the list, especially since I am >=20 > 1. workiing on a sunday > 2. posting financials db from Oracle 8 to 9i and fixing all the invalids = in > the pl/sql. >=20 > Why should I suffer alone? > Raj >=20 > On 6/12/05, Mladen Gogala <gogala@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > The same old quality first shown in the patchset 9.2.0.6 <http://9.2.0.= 6> They > > published an empty f...@###! document! Raj, you're priceless! > > -- > > Mladen Gogala > > Oracle DBA > > > > > > >=20 > -- > //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l > -- //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l