Negative ramifications of setting CPU_COUNT lower?
- From: Charles Schultz <sacrophyte@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: ORACLE-L <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 08:46:33 -0600
Good day, We recently moved 55 databases from a Sun F15K to a Sun T5440. You can imagine what happened next. =) Reading Glenn Fawcett's blog<http://blogs.sun.com/glennf/entry/virtual_cpus_effect_on_oracle>, we indeed see that CPU_COUNT = 256. I have filed an SR with Oracle, but as I wait I am curious if those of you in the know could tell me what are the negative ramifications of resetting CPU_COUNT. If we go forward with this action, I want to do so in an informed manner, and not simply shooting in the dark. Thanks. -- Charles Schultz
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: Negative ramifications of setting CPU_COUNT lower?
- From: Allen, Brandon
- Re: Negative ramifications of setting CPU_COUNT lower?
- From: Greg Rahn
- RE: Negative ramifications of setting CPU_COUNT lower?
- From: Mark W. Farnham
- RE: Negative ramifications of setting CPU_COUNT lower?
Other related posts:
- » Negative ramifications of setting CPU_COUNT lower? - Charles Schultz
- » RE: Negative ramifications of setting CPU_COUNT lower? - Allen, Brandon
- » Re: Negative ramifications of setting CPU_COUNT lower? - Greg Rahn
- » Re: Negative ramifications of setting CPU_COUNT lower? - Charles Schultz
- » Re: Negative ramifications of setting CPU_COUNT lower? - Greg Rahn
- » RE: Negative ramifications of setting CPU_COUNT lower? - Allen, Brandon
- » RE: Negative ramifications of setting CPU_COUNT lower? - Mark W. Farnham
- » Re: Negative ramifications of setting CPU_COUNT lower? - Dan Norris
- » RE: Negative ramifications of setting CPU_COUNT lower? - Mark W. Farnham