RE: .NET Stored Procedures in Oracle database
- To: "Oracle-L" <Oracle-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 15 Mar 2006 12:40:39 -0700
When I was looking at Yukon (pre ss2005) - the Stored Proc's under .NET
had the ability to open up the db for anyone to do anything. There were
3 levels of security. I would thoroughly test it before opening your
data base up.
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 11:41 AM
To: Oracle-L
Subject: RE: .NET Stored Procedures in Oracle database
Fyi, this is related to the fact that SQL Server 2005 now offers CLR.
CLR is the Common Runtime Language "engine" that let you have managed
code running, built on .NET languages, within the SQL Server engine.
Since MS now provides it, Oracle also has to.
M$ has been touting this features, so this is Oracle's reply.
John
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Christian Antognini
Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2006 9:58 AM
To: juancarlosreyesp@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Oracle-L
Subject: RE: .NET Stored Procedures in Oracle database
Juan
>Had you read this?
>Is this better than using java?
>Any experience?
Notice that:
- The stored procedures don't run *in* the database.
- It's a simple external call... as we used to do with C shared
libraries.
- This is a Windows only feature.
Basically it makes only sense if you already have some kind of library
that you *absolutely* want to call from the database. The same thing
applies to Java in the database. Therefore, IMHO, one is not better than
the other.
HTH
Chris
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
