Re: Mview refresh is much slower in 10g
- From: "Gints Plivna" <gints.plivna@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: Smith.Steven@xxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2007 00:36:03 +0200
2007/1/19, Smith, Steven K - MSHA <Smith.Steven@xxxxxxx>:
We set up 2 identical materialized views - *_MVW_1 and *_MVW_2
Refresh them on an alternating schedule. As part of the refresh jobs,
recreate a synonym pointing to the newly refreshed view as the last step and
use that synonym to reference the materialized view.
Except for the synonym part we did exactly the same solution for our
searching. I have even written an article explaining how we did that
in
http://www.gplivna.eu/papers/mat_views_search.htm
Gints Plivna
http://www.gplivna.eu
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- Follow-Ups:
- performance in 10g
- From: David Boyd
- References:
- Re: Mview refresh is much slower in 10g
- From: jaromir nemec
- RE: Mview refresh is much slower in 10g
- From: Smith, Steven K - MSHA
Other related posts:
- » Mview refresh is much slower in 10g
- » Re: Mview refresh is much slower in 10g
- » Re: Mview refresh is much slower in 10g
- » Re: Mview refresh is much slower in 10g
- » Re: Mview refresh is much slower in 10g
- » RE: Mview refresh is much slower in 10g
- » Re: Mview refresh is much slower in 10g
We set up 2 identical materialized views - *_MVW_1 and *_MVW_2 Refresh them on an alternating schedule. As part of the refresh jobs, recreate a synonym pointing to the newly refreshed view as the last step and use that synonym to reference the materialized view.
- performance in 10g
- From: David Boyd
- Re: Mview refresh is much slower in 10g
- From: jaromir nemec
- RE: Mview refresh is much slower in 10g
- From: Smith, Steven K - MSHA