RE: Moving to 9i.....

  • From: "Rognes, Sten" <Sten.Rognes@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "'oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 15:15:17 -0700

Mark,
Noticed your combination of Solaris8 and sga_max_size, which can be a fatal
combination performance wise dependent on your Solaris8 patch level. I
posted a note on this a while back with a Metalink reference:
//www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/03-2004/msg01531.html

Sten

-----Original Message-----
From: Bobak, Mark [mailto:Mark.Bobak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 3:03 PM
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Moving to 9i.....


Nope, only thing we did was go from db_block_buffers to db_cache_size,
set an sga_max_size, and dropped a bunch of _ parameters that had
accumulated over the years.

SQL> show parameter pool


NAME                                 TYPE        VALUE
------------------------------------ -----------
------------------------------
buffer_pool_keep                     string
buffer_pool_recycle                  string
global_context_pool_size             string
java_pool_size                       big integer 33554432
large_pool_size                      big integer 0
olap_page_pool_size                  integer     33554432
shared_pool_reserved_size            big integer 10905190
shared_pool_size                     big integer 218103808

Mark J. Bobak
Oracle DBA
ProQuest Company
Ann Arbor, MI
"Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc"


-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Milligan, Michael=20
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 5:47 PM
To: 'oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Cc: Pandian, Thiru
Subject: RE: Moving to 9i.....


Did you change any init.ora settings? (shared_pool_size,
shared_pool_reserved_size, etc.)

-----Original Message-----
From: Bobak, Mark [mailto:Mark.Bobak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, July 26, 2004 3:31 PM
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Pandian, Thiru
Subject: Moving to 9i.....


Ok, we're in the midst of moving one of our primary systems to 9i.  With
the same codebase, going from 8i (32bit on Solaris 8) to 9i (64 bit, on
Solaris 8), suddenly, I'm seeing lots of system CPU activity.  %sys cpu
consumption is running 2 to 1 over %usr, huge numbers of system calls
and spins on mutex, according to mpstat.
For some reason, Oracle is doing LOTS more system calls.  I tried
trussing a couple of the hot server processses, I see lots and lots of
poll(), pread() and times() sys calls.  Inside the db, this translates
to lots and lots of latch free on cache buffers chains and library
cache.  But, I suspect that it's secondary due to the CPU staravtion
caused by the heavy syscall activity.


Any thoughts or ideas are welcome......


-Mark

PS  Just moved from (db_block_buffers, db_keep_pool,db_recycle_pool) to
(db_cache_size, db_keep_cache_size, db_recycle_size, and are setting a
sga_max_size) and also, no automatic undo.


Mark J. Bobak
Oracle DBA
ProQuest Company
Ann Arbor, MI
"Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc"


----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to:  oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------


This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or
proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity to
which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended
recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified
that
any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited.
If
you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by
replying
to this message and delete this e-mail immediately.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to:  oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to:  oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to:  oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Other related posts: